en gruppe mennesker som poserer for et bilde foran et bord

Recap of Cloud Stories from Norway, Episode 6: Migrating 120 VMs to Azure in 1.5 months in TINE

Maxim Salnikov

Maxim Salnikov

Developer Engagement Lead

Lesetid, 8 min.

The next episode of the “Cloud stories from Norway” videoshow is ready for watching! In this 40-minutes long show we feature Azure cloud best practices, patterns, tips & tricks used in production in the products and services of well-known Norwegian companies.

For this episode, Maxim Salnikov from Microsoft invited Jan Egil Ring, a Lead Architect at Crayon – an important partner of Microsoft, that helps Norwegian and not only companies to build and operate cloud projects, and Morten Hansen, an Infrastructure Architect at TINE – the largest Norwegian dairy product cooperative consisting of around 15 000 farmers and more than 5 000 employees. From two short, focused tech sessions you will learn about

  • Best practices and findings during the migrating of 120 VMs to Azure in just 1.5 months
  • What other projects on Azure are under development in TINE and Crayon
  • Many more cloud tips & tricks to skill you up on cloud technologies!

The video is available online, you can watch it here: On-demand

We received many technical questions during event, here are the answers on some of them:

How did you do in order to get a cost estimate for the Azure related costs for this migration? Could you use the TCO calculator in Azure? We used Azure Migrate to perform an initial assessment of the whole datacenter, and then broke it down to the VMs that was in scope for the migration project. The assessment feature in Azure Migrate is really good and allows you to select factors such as region, reserved instances and so on. For common infrastructure costs like ExpressRoute which was implemented in the same time frame we used the Azure Pricing calculator. Although, the Azure TCO Calculator you mentioned very useful in order to account for all costs such as datacenter operations, so you get a good insights into Total Cost of Ownership.
Have you adopted ‘subscription democratization’ principle from the Enterprise-Scale or have you chosen to retain a full control of subscriptons within central IT? If the latter one, what were the main reasons? Central IT is in charge of common «infrastructure subscriptions» such as the hub subscription (ExpressRoute, domain controllers and such) & the landing zone for the AMP project. Others subscriptions are created on a business unit basis where central IT provides some control with regards to networking and access controls – using Azure AD PIM and RBAC to provide access for application owners, vendors and so on.
Regarding your monitoring strategy: have you moved SCOM VMs ‘as-is’ to Azure or have you adopted cloud native tools with Azure Monitor, Log Analytics, workbooks, etc.? SCOM VMs was moved as-is, and is mainly used for monitoring the datacenter and the ~30 production plants. For new cloud native services, Azure Monitor is being leveraged as the primary tool of choice. One of the reasons of continuing the usage of SCOM is that Tine already have invested a lot of time and efforts in the SCOM infrastructure, using SquaredUp on top for dashboarding. Also, Azure Monitor is not so suitable for all existing technologies in Windows Server such as Failover Clustering and so on. Tine us using Azure Arc for all on-premises servers though, so we might look into the new Azure Monitoring agent deployed via Arc at some point.
How big was the project teams from Crayon and Tine and how was it (rougly) divided in terms of technical competency areas? The project team was 5-6 persons working with priority. And we had the possibility to get help from others since this project was important to TINE.
Was the main reason for chosing Azure vs competitors that Azure had/created server locations in Norway? That was one of the main reasons. We needed fast response times to different services, for instance database and integrations services. The response times in Norway compared to outside Norway was noticeable: ~20-25 ms to West Europe, ~4-5 ms to Norway East with VPN and ~2-3 ms to Norway East with ExpressRoute.
I see that you used a hub & spoke architecture and that you used different vnets for the spokes. How would it work with using subnets instead of vnets? How much cost would it save and would it be worth it? If using one large VNet divided into multiple subnets instead of carving out multiple VNets, one would have been tied to a single subscription as a VNet cannot span multiple subscriptions. As a VNet itself doesn`t incur any cost, I don`t believe the cost difference would be much (if anything). There are other elements to think of when moving the discussion to one subscription vs many. A single subscription for an Enterprise is considered an anti-pattern in the Cloud Adoption Framework. There are many reasons for this discussed in the framework, but one thing to consider is that a subscription is «a unit of scale». There is a certain amount of virtual Cores, virtual machines and so on available by default within a subscription. To go above these, one must file a quota increase request and detail the demand now and in the coming 6-12 months. Even though the cloud is «limitless», there are some boundaries in practice – so planning is key.
About backup solution, what do you recommend when you have servers running on prem as well as in Azure? Good to have 2 solution or just one azure solution for all servers? It depends whether there are any existing backup solution in place on-premises which makes sense to continue or not, but in general we backup services where they run with regards to RTOs. For on-premises, we also leverage the Azure Backup integration in System Center DPM both for off-site storage and for long-term retention (it replaced tape-based backups 6-7 years ago). In you have a greenfield environment and do not have any System Center DPM licenses, you could use Azure Backup Server which is essentially the same product, but with a difference licensing model (tied to an Azure subscription instead of a System Center licence). That is, if you are keen to leverage a Microsoft product for on-premises backups – which makes sense when using Windows Server and other Microsoft products. There are Azure backup/storage integrations in 3rd party product such as Veeam as well.
A question for Morten: Can you give a ball park figure on the cost or time savings this project has given you? The cost savings is just for TIP is just for the project work itself between 100000-200000, in addition to time saved with regards to being able to deliver infrastructure on-demand. We also would have needed more servers on-prem. Since we have 2 datacenters we saved 2 more physical servers approx 350000,- in addition. And that is only for TIP. We also have some minor projects that has given cost savings. BUT: In addition we have gained so much better control and documentation. Cost is of course important, but using Tags to document and work in a better way gives a lot of ‘unexpected’ savings. And also, to turn off servers between 22:00-07:00 (test environments for instance) saves us money. For production workloads which needs 24/7 availability, we are using Reserved Instances which saves a significant amount over 3 years.
Hi! Was Azure Migration tool used to the purpose of getting an overall insight of the on-prem infrastructure? The AMP project main purpose was to move servers, but it also gave us one advantage we have not thought about: When system owners were asked if servers had to run 24/7 or if they were critical we actually managed to remove some of the servers as well. The tool also helped us get a better overview of the ON-prem environment.
How can new organizations learn from Crayon journey and working towards the UN sustainability goals? I recommend to read this regarding goals: https://www.microsoft.com/en-us/corporate-responsibility/un-sustainable-development-goals
How fast is Azure (spinning up VM’s, generating tags, web client performance etc) vs competitors? In the past, provisioning VMs was a bit slower than the competiton, but after implementing a new feature where I believe there are «hot standby» VMs waiting for customizations in the backend it has improved significantly. Typically when provisioning a Windows VM using a Terraform template, it completes in ~3 minutes. Linux is faster (depending on distro). For other services I haven`t made any comparisons, but in genereal it varies a lot by service. It is also enhanced in newer versions, for example Application Gateway deploys in ~25 minutes vs ~45 minutes in the V2 SKU vs the V1 SKU IIRC.

Stay tuned for the next episode of the “Cloud stories from Norway”!

How to follow all Microsoft Norway’s and local tech communities’ events about Azure cloud for the developers – conferences, seminars, workshops, training, webinars, etc.? Just follow our technical twitter https://twitter.com/MSDevNo

To stay connected:

 

Feel free to send your questions about the Azure cloud technology and educational events here: maxim.salnikov@microsoft.com

Maxim Salnikov

Developer Engagement Lead at Microsoft Norway

 

All episodes of “Cloud stories from Norway»

Oppdag flere relaterte artikler per bransje:

Detaljhandel

Finans og forsikring

  • tech workers in bank

    Slik implementeres Copilot i bankbransjen

    DNB og SpareBank 1 delte av sine erfaringer og produktivitetsgevinster med Copilot: – For flere føles det ut som de jukser på jobben, sier prosjektleder.  Å lykkes med Copilot krever noe ganske annet enn å implementere ny programvare eller en applikasjon på arbeidsplassen. Den kunstig intelligente assistenten fra Microsoft representerer en helt annen måte å […]

  • Norwegian Fintech Cloud Community

    Norwegian Fintech Cloud Community

    On March 21st, we held the first ever Norwegian Fintech Cloud Community in our offices in Oslo! Thank you to both technical/developer leads and business leaders for joining us for this day of inspirational talks by other financial organisations and cloud experts from Microsoft, as they shared best practices in building solutions in the cloud. […]

Government

  • KI på kontoret: Personlig produktivitet og effektivisering i Oslo kommune

    KI på kontoret: Personlig produktivitet og effektivisering i Oslo kommune

    Nå ser en av Norges største arbeidsplasser mot kunstig intelligens for å gjøre ansatte mer effektive – og for å levere bedre tjenester til Oslos innbyggere:   En by er et sofistikert maskineri. Alt fra helsetilbud og renovasjonssystemer til kollektivtransport er brikker i et enormt puslespill som må passe for at hjulene skal gå rundt.   Det […]

Helseomsorg

  • Nytt intranett gjør jobben til vernepleieren Mari enklere 

    Nytt intranett gjør jobben til vernepleieren Mari enklere 

    Nå får over 20 000 ansatte i Helse Midt-Norge tilgang til en felles og standardisert samhandlingsplattform: – Gir bedre behandlingstilbud, mener vernepleier.   Mari Nevermo Hanssen er på vei til en videregående skole sør for Steinkjer for å observere en elev som utredes for autisme. Høsten har ankommet Trøndelag, men den unge vernepleieren er blid læll:  […]

  • Two female healthcare professionals looking at a tablet

    Virtual Care webinar

    En diskusjon om Virtual Care-løsningene som er muliggjort av Microsoft Teams – vekket til live av en casestudie i Italia.

Industri

  • Azure Skills2

    Knowledge Mining – Uncover Latent Insights within Your Organization

    Thank you for joining us at Knowledge Mining – Uncover Latent Insights within Your Organization! The video is available on demand, and you can watch it at any time here    If you would like to reach one of our speakers:  Izabela Hawrylko, Data & AI Specialist at Microsoft  https://www.linkedin.com/in/izabelahawrylko/   Izabela.Hawrylko@microsoft.com   Ignacio Floristan, Global Black Belt AI Specialist […]

  • en person som sitter ved et skrivebord med en bærbar PC på et bord

    Hvordan tilrettelegge for dine ansatte i usikre tider

    Microsofts Max Tchapeyou tilbyr et veldig personlig synspunkt, med henvisning til de seks måtene han har funnet for å jobbe mer effektivt – og positivt – med teamet sitt.

Offentlig sektor

Utdanning

  • en kvinne som bruker en bærbar PC

    Finn ut hvordan du kan forsterke undervisningen med blandet læring

    Siden COVID-19-utbruddet har våre kunder i utdanningssektoren gjort en fantastisk innsats for å holde elevene engasjert mens de har hjemmeskole. Fra e-læringsinnovasjon til å inspirere og motivere med foto- og matlagingsoppgaver – lærere og elever har virkelig demonstrert stå-på-vilje i en vanskelig tid. Skoler og universiteter har opplevd den enestående verdien som nettbasert læring kan […]

  • Effektiv blandet læring med Microsoft Teams

    Effektiv blandet læring med Microsoft Teams

    COVID-19 har hatt stor innvirkning på dagene til millioner av lærere og elever over hele verden. Microsoft Education-teamet har vært opptatt av å hjelpe alle med å holde kontakten og holde engasjementet oppe gjennom fjernundervisning. Og nå, når land etter land begynner å komme ut av krisen, hjelper Microsoft skoler med å gå over til […]

Oppdag flere relaterte artikler per dossier:

Digital Transformation

  • Copilot: Enkelt forklart

    Copilot: Enkelt forklart

    Jobb raskere, bli mer produktiv og øk kreativiteten med Copilot: Din daglige KI-hjelper. Men hva er egentlig Copilot?  Copilot er et kraftig produktivitetsverktøy fra Microsoft som bruker kunstig intelligens for å gjøre arbeidshverdagen din bedre og mer effektiv. Ved hjelp av avansert generativ KI-teknologi, kan Copilot både forstå instrukser og selv lage innhold.   På mange […]

Kundehistorier

Presse

Sikkerhet og personvern

  • en gruppe mennesker som ser på en bærbar PC

    Sikre bedriften din når ansatte jobber hjemmefra 

    Nå for tiden er det kanskje ikke cybersikkerhet vi prioriterer høyest. Men organisasjoner over hele verden bør vite om truslene som følger med å gå over fra tradisjonelt kontorarbeid til fjernarbeid. Når vi ønsker å komme raskt i gang med skysamarbeidstjenester for å hjelpe de ansatte med å jobbe hjemmefra, er det lett å glemme […]

Tips